Opinio Juris

A weblog dedicated to reports, commentary, and debate on current developments and scholarship
in the fields of international law and politics

ICJ Issues Judgment in Malaysia/Singapore Case
On Friday, the ICJ issued its judgment in Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia/Singapore). A summary sent by the ICJ stated that
it had found by 12 votes to four that Pedra Blanca/Pulau Batu Puteh, a granite island in the Straits of Singapore on which a lighthouse stands, belongs to Singapore and has done so since at least 1980, when the dispute between the two countries crystallized.

In the case of Middle Rocks, which consist of a group of rocks that are permanently above water, the ICJ … ruled 15 to one that it belongs to Malaysia.

The court also noted that South Ledge, a nearby low-tide elevation, falls within the apparently overlapping territorial waters generated by Pedra Blanca/Pulau Batu Puteh and by Middle Rocks. Given that the two countries have not asked the court to draw the line of delimitation, the judges said, by 15 to one, that sovereignty belongs to the State in the territorial waters of which it is located.
The press release, including a detailed summary of the opinion, is here and the full opinion available here.
05.27.2008 at 12:49pm
nightstallion:
A related question: There are a number of active cases on the ICJ's homepage which are rather... strange.

Romania v Ukraine: The last deadline expired in July 2007 and was not extended.
Hungary v Slovakia: Last deadline expired in *December 1998*.
Congo v Uganda: The case seems to be completely over...?

Why exactly are these three cases still considered active? The first two should have been closed by default by now, and the last one is obviously over as the judgment has been given, or not? Similarily, shouldn't the Malaysia v Singapore case also be removed, as it has been judged on?
5.31.2008 9:56am

Post as: [Register] [Log In]

Account:
Password:
Remember info?